stanza 2, slokas 1-2

STANZA II.
1. . . . Where were the builders, the luminous sons of Manvantaric dawn? . . . In the unknown darkness in their Ah-hi Paranishpanna. The producers of form from no-form—the root of the world—the Devamatri and Svâbhâvat, rested in the bliss of non-being.
2. . . . Where was silence? Where the ears to sense it? No, there was neither silence nor sound; naught save ceaseless eternal breath, which knows itself not.

 

“Mr. A. Keightley:  Then all substances on the physical plane are really so many correlations or combinations of these elements and ultimately of the one element.

 
Mme. Blavatsky:  Most assuredly, if you only realized this: how many times I have spoken to you about this, that the first thing to realize is the existence of One and only One, i.e., of the Absolute. You have to start from universals to the particulars. You cannot proceed on your Aristotelian system, you will never come to anything.

 
You will come to grief and confusion, and you will be always knocking your heads against stone walls, and your heads will come out second best. [How can you come and begin a thing? On its appearance you have to go to the primal motor and beyond that to the spiritual cause.]

 
Mr. Kingsland:  How could we do that before we are initiates?

 
Mme. Blavatsky:  I beg your pardon, there is no need to become initiates. There is something beyond matter, but the men of science laugh at metaphysics, and they say, “fiddlesticks for your metas”, and yet I say they are always dealing with metaphysics; that is what they do.

 
Mr. Kingsland:  You can start with that hypothesis.

 
Mme. Blavatsky:  If you permit metaphysics in your hypothesis, and you do not believe in metaphysics, what is your hypothesis worth?

 
Take, for instance, ether. Now, in Webster’s Dictionary, what do they call it? “A problematical or hypothetical agent of so and so, which is not yet believed in.” They take it as just a necessity, and yet you build on that ether the whole theory – axiomatic, mind you, your axiomatic teachings of light, and your vibrations.

 
What right have you to do it? If you base yourself on a phantom of your imagination, a physical consciousness that it is such a thing, I call it humbug and sham.

 
Mr. Kingsland:  You want us to go further back?

 
Mme. Blavatsky:  I want men with something like brains, but not men with brains only on the physical plane that they cannot see beyond. They have not got feelers or antennae.”

 

H. P. Blavatsky

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s