tktt: Theosophists And Members Of The “T.S.”

“Enq:  Are we to understand that the inner group of the T.S. claims to learn what it does from real initiates or masters of esoteric wisdom?

 
Theo:  Not directly. The personal presence of such masters is not required. Suffice it if they give instructions to some of those who have studied under their guidance for years, and devoted their whole lives to their service.

 
Then, in turn, these can give out the knowledge so imparted to others, who had no such opportunity. A portion of the true sciences is better than a mass of undigested and misunderstood learning. An ounce of gold is worth a ton of dust.

 
Enq:  But how is one to know whether the ounce is real gold or only a counterfeit?

 
Theo:  A tree is known by its fruit, a system by its results. When our opponents are able to prove to us that any solitary student of Occultism throughout the ages has become a saintly adept like Ammonius Saccas, or even Plotinus, or a Theurgist like Iamblichus, or achieved feats such as are claimed to have been done by St. Germain, without any master to guide him, and all this without being a medium, a self-deluded psychic, or a charlatan — then shall we confess ourselves mistaken.

 
But till then, Theosophists prefer to follow the proven natural law of the tradition of the Sacred Science.

 
There are mystics who have made great discoveries in chemistry and physical sciences, almost bordering on alchemy and Occultism; others who, by the sole aid of their genius, have rediscovered portions, if not the whole, of the lost alphabets of the “Mystery language”, and are, therefore, able to read correctly Hebrew scrolls;

 
others still, who, being seers, have caught wonderful glimpses of the hidden secrets of Nature. But all these are specialists. One is a theoretical inventor, another a Hebrew, i.e., a Sectarian Kabalist, a third a Swedenborg of modern times, denying all and everything outside of his own particular science or religion.

 
Not one of them can boast of having produced a universal or even a national benefit thereby, not even to himself.

 
With the exception of a few healers – of that class which the Royal College of Physicians or Surgeons would call quacks – none have helped with their science Humanity, nor even a number of men of the same community.

 
Where are the Chaldees of old, those who wrought marvelous cures, “not by charms but by simples”?  Where is an Apollonius of Tyana, who healed the sick and raised the dead under any climate and circumstances?

 
We know some specialists of the former class in Europe, but none of the latter – except in Asia, where the secret of the Yogi, “to live in death”, is still preserved.”

 
H. P. Blavatsky