tktt: Why, Then, Is There So Much Prejudice Against The T.S.?

“Enq:  But you cannot deny that the Phallic element does exist in the religions of the East?

 
Theo:  Nor do I deny it; only I maintain that this proves no more than does its presence in Christianity, the religion of the West. Read Hargrave Jenning’s Rosicrucians, if you would assure yourself of it.

 
In the East, the Phallic symbolism is, perhaps, more crude, because more true to nature, or, I would rather say, more naive and sincere than in the West. But it is not more licentious, nor does it suggest to the Oriental mind the same gross and coarse ideas as to the Western, with, perhaps, one or two exceptions, such as the shameful sect known as the “Maharajah”, or Vallabhacharya sect.

 
Enq:  A writer in the Agnostic journal – one of your accusers – has just hinted that the followers of this disgraceful sect are Theosophists, and “claim true Theosophic insight.”

 
Theo:  He wrote a falsehood, and that’s all. There never was, nor is there at present, one single Vallabhacharya in our Society. As to their having, or claiming Theosophic insight, that is another fib, based on crass ignorance about the Indian Sects.

 
Their “Maharajah” only claims a right to the money, wives and daughters of his foolish followers and no more. This sect is despised by all the other Hindus. But you will find the whole subject dealt with at length in the Secret Doctrine, to which I must again refer you for detailed explanations.

 
To conclude, the very soul of Theosophy is dead against Phallic worship; and its occult or esoteric section more so even than the exoteric teachings. There was never a more lying statement made than the above. And now ask me some other questions.”

 
H. P. Blavatsky