tktt: On The Sacredness Of The Pledge

“Enq:  Have you any ethical system that you carry out in the Society?

 
Theo:  The ethics are there, ready and clear enough for whomsoever would follow them. They are the essence and cream of the world’s ethic’s, gathered from the teachings of all the world’s great reformers.

 
Therefore, you will find represented therein Confucius and Zoroaster, Laotze and the Bhagavat-Gita, the precepts of Gautama Buddha and Jesus of Nazareth, of Hillel and his school, as of Pythagoras, Socrates, Plato, and their schools.

 
Enq:  Do the members of your Society carry out these precepts? I have heard of great dissensions and quarrels among them.

 
Theo:  Very naturally, since although the reform (in its present shape) may be called new, the men and women to be reformed are the same human, sinning natures of old.

 
As already said, the earnest working members are few; but many are the sincere and well-disposed persons, who try their best to live up to the Society’s and their own ideals.

 
Our duty is to encourage and assist individual fellows in self-improvement, intellectual, moral, and spiritual; not to blame or condemn those who fail.

 
We have, strictly speaking, no right to refuse admission to anyone – especially in the Esoteric Section of the Society, wherein “he who enters is as one newly born.”

 
But if any member, his sacred pledges on his word of honor and immortal Self notwithstanding, chooses to continue, after that “new birth”, with the new man, the vices or defects of his old life, and to indulge in them still in the Society, then, of course, he is more than likely to be asked to resign and withdraw; or, in case of his refusal, to be expelled. We have the strictest rules for such emergencies.

 
Enq:  Can some of them be mentioned?

 
Theo:  They can. To begin with, no Fellow in the Society, whether exoteric or esoteric, has a right to force his personal opinions upon another Fellow.  “It is not lawful for any officer of the Parent Society to express in public, by word or act, any hostility to, or preference for, any one section (A “branch”, or lodge, composed solely of co-religionists, or a branch in partibus, as they are now somewhat bombastically called), religious or philosophical, more than another.

 
All have an equal right to have the essential features of their religious belief laid before the tribunal of an impartial world. And no officer of the Society, in his capacity as an officer, has the right to preach his own sectarian views and beliefs to members assembled, except when the meeting consists of his co-religionists.

 
After due warning, violation of this rule shall be punished by suspension or expulsion.” This is one of the offences in the Society at large.

 
As regards the inner section, now called the Esoteric, the following rules have been laid down and adopted, so far back as 1880.

 
“No Fellow shall put to his selfish use any knowledge communicated to him by any member of the first section (now a higher ‘degree’); violation of the rule being punished by expulsion.”

 
Now, however, before any such knowledge can be imparted, the applicant has to bind himself by a solemn oath not to use it for selfish purposes, nor to reveal anything said except by permission.”

 
H. P. Blavatsky

Leave a comment